YELLOW CARD of the week: runner up for most infuriating person/event of the week

All Those Who Condemn the World Cup 2022 in Qatar


FIFA’s December decision to hold the 2022 World Cup in Qatar was controversial to say the least for other countries who were bidding, mainly England, the rest of Europe and some figures from the United States. From corruption allegations linked to Qatar being picked, weather issues as the WC is supposed to be held in June-July which is summer for Qatar, and the lack of football pedigree of Qatar. It all boils down to the insistence of many that football should stay within the confines of its elite, in effect creating a geo-political ethnocentric view of how football should expand. Being a football convert from WC South Africa those arguments demean what football has meant to so many. Hence, does it follow that because of these setbacks that can be averted in 11 years the Middle East has less of a right to host a WC? The name of the tournament itself denotes internationalism for football.

Football for all

Holding the WC in Qatar would entail a tremendous leap for football as a whole, expanding in an often misunderstood region of Asia where no WC has ever been held. The allure of a WC is not only quality stadiums but expanding football as tenets for cultural identity. I must reiterate football is created through the grassroots and how it is appreciated as a mass oriented sport, contrary to having quality stadiums, hordes of hooligans, an income generator and home to successful clubs. The 2010 WC is the first in Africa, 2018 will have it for the first time in the eastern European area; FIFA and Blatter are on a mission to bring football to the world not to where it has already gone. It can even be argued that England’s success in domestic football is partly due to its previous hosting of the tournament which inevitably draws legions of people to stadiums.
Among the selling points of holding the WC in Qatar would be the stadiums that would somehow be air-conditioned reducing the temperature by 20 degrees or more. Mostly it was that after the tournament Qatar promised to take parts of the stadiums apart to donate to poorer countries who lack facilities, Philippines? Besides that, is weather really the issue? What will having a WC in England or USA do for the international football community besides translate itself into a profit?

”I’m so bored with the USA” – The Clash

USA’s Landon Donovan jokingly tweeted “I have an idea … we play Qatar in a friendly (they can even host it), and the winner gets to host the 2022 WC … wait, do they even have a team?” The ignorance comes from a man who doesn’t really have a right to boast about American football having never gone past the round of 16 and having never won anything in an international competition. Who the hell is Donovan to talk about football pedigree? The USA had their chance in 1994 when they hosted, they developed a domestic league as a result, now it seems, unsurprisingly that 2022 is a chance to bring more money into their imperialist industries; as the WC generates the majority of all income for football in general. As of now Qatar have their own national team and league, what more in 11 years?

The English express similar sentiments at just about every sport segment of BBC, every English football blog etc; Blatter was right to call them sore losers. He also recently announced that the tournament could be held in the winter season, though disrupting the schedules of many football leagues, isn’t it worth taking football someplace new and more importantly, someplace relevant? Racism and geo-centrism in European football stem from the same kind of intolerant attitude that put their leagues on a pedestal.

VIVA FIFA!

Many also accuse FIFA of corruption in the bid for 2022 hosting duties, whoateallthepies.tv said “we’re now all just waiting for Sepp Blatter to shuffle off. Then maybe FIFA can at last become the transparent, honourable organisation football needs it to be.” With absolutely no evidence it’s hard to imagine especially coming from the Philippines where top FIFA officials were instrumental in ousting the very corrupt former Philippine Football Federation President Jose Mari Martinez. Moreover, with or without the corruption allegations Qatar would still have been a good choice for the world cup given its significance for the progress of world football. There may be some things on the ground that contributed to corruption speculation but when you take a look at the big picture it wouldn’t have made the choice for Qatar any less suitable.

Right now, the Asian Cup is going on in Qatar, having hosted the 2006 Asian games among others they proved they can do justice to such events.

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

2 responses to “YELLOW CARD of the week: runner up for most infuriating person/event of the week

  1. Lacedaemonian

    I agree that that region of the world should hold World Cups but I cannot fathom the choice of that country. Australia would have been a great choice as would China or India in the future. Saudi Arabia or Iran would have been more relevant than Qatar. This decision stinks of corruption and I do not buy the arguments about ‘legacy’ and new markets.

    • First off I also agree that the WC held in Middle East regardless of Qatar would still have the same culturally significant impact. What I said doesn’t necessarily divulge into Qatar as the ultimate sporting venue but to football being taken to new places, of which the middle east poses the perfect example. Though the fact is China, India, Iran and Saudi Arabia were not part of the bids, we have to focus on what was available to us. Australia is also a good choice but it apparently fell short of technical matters of selling their bid as something outstanding hence being voted out the first round.

      Corruption however is a confounded issue in terms of how we look at it, not in terms of corruption itself which is invariably bad but of where the accusations are coming from. Granted this isn’t the first corruption scandal to plague international football but it doesn’t have to become a convenient cry for the distraught when FIFA makes the “wrong” decision. The USA was somewhat in the trail of corruption that befell the bids yet Qatar is the one taking the punches. Whose to say England does not have the capacity for this kind of thing? Qatar have the money and have been defined by rapid economic growth, but also along the lines of conservative criticism mystifying the region as backward. It stinks of corruption true but it doesn’t have to be felt solely with regard to the bid winners.

      New markets remain to be seen, it’s 11 years ahead of us.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s